| 1 |
On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 12:14 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:02 PM NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > On 12/11/19 9:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > Append RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" in the default case when |
| 6 |
> > > virtualx |
| 7 |
> > > is conditional to USE=test. This fixes 440 MissingTestRestrict |
| 8 |
> > > warnings. |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> |
| 11 |
> > > --- |
| 12 |
> > > eclass/virtualx.eclass | 2 ++ |
| 13 |
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > diff --git a/eclass/virtualx.eclass b/eclass/virtualx.eclass |
| 16 |
> > > index 40eeea5463bc..6aba6bf488dd 100644 |
| 17 |
> > > --- a/eclass/virtualx.eclass |
| 18 |
> > > +++ b/eclass/virtualx.eclass |
| 19 |
> > > @@ -89,6 +89,8 @@ case ${VIRTUALX_REQUIRED} in |
| 20 |
> > > fi |
| 21 |
> > > RDEPEND="" |
| 22 |
> > > IUSE="${VIRTUALX_REQUIRED}" |
| 23 |
> > > + [[ ${VIRTUALX_REQUIRED} == test ]] && |
| 24 |
> > > + RESTRICT+=" !test? ( test )" |
| 25 |
> > > ;; |
| 26 |
> > > esac |
| 27 |
> > > |
| 28 |
> > > |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > Is there a better way to address this than editing a ton of |
| 31 |
> > eclasses |
| 32 |
> > independently? |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> Not really. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Seems a good candidate for a future EAPI |
Archives