| 1 |
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:22:31 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 PM, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > When should ewarns vs news items be used to inform users about changes? |
| 5 |
> > I'm not asking for a policy, just thoughts about when one or the other |
| 6 |
> > should be used. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> IMHO it is almost pointless to issue news this far after the event. |
| 10 |
> Just about anybody impacted will have already broken their systems and |
| 11 |
> fixed them by now. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
People usually don't update @world daily, so even news with one |
| 14 |
month delay will be useful for many. Of course, warning about |
| 15 |
serious issues beforehand is preferred when possible. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives