| 1 |
Alexandre Rostovtsev posted on Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:13:36 -0400 as |
| 2 |
excerpted: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 16:04 +0300, Sergey Popov wrote: |
| 5 |
>> You want to migrate to such decision? Like: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> qt? ( |
| 8 |
>> > qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:5 ) !qt5? ( dev-lang/qtcore:4 ) |
| 9 |
>> ) |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> Fine by me, if you would ask. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> That flag should be called "gui". Not "qt". |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> This would be the real solution to gnome team's gtk/gtk2/gtk3 flag |
| 16 |
> problem and to qt team's flag problem too. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Hasn't the X USE flag effectively been the gui USE flag (with curses as a |
| 19 |
semi-gui USE flag)? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
With wayland coming along, what will be the effect, since we'll |
| 22 |
effectively have two separate GUIs, then, instead of X being the de facto |
| 23 |
gui USE flag? Of course X remains the default for now, but for how long? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 27 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 28 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives