| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:54:02PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
| 2 |
> Josh Saddler wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Because as much as possible, we need to see something concrete, not "maybe |
| 4 |
> > an arch tester." We need to have a better definition of what "when needed |
| 5 |
> > is" and who these "some people" are -- think about it. Do we want a system |
| 6 |
> > that works like devship, but only halfway -- like you suggested, just |
| 7 |
> > passing the ebuild quiz -- or is something more needed? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If it needs to be extended a new GLEP like this one can be written or this |
| 10 |
> one extended. This is only about bugzilla access, nothing more. So no, it |
| 11 |
> is meant to be as non-concrete as possible to allow usage in as many cases |
| 12 |
> as possible. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
This practically means opening up bugzie to world + dog. Maybe not right |
| 15 |
now but being so non-concrete as you call it means we can never tell |
| 16 |
anybody no. All they have to do is calling themselves a contributor. |
| 17 |
Personally I think this is only going to lead to chaos and I'm not at |
| 18 |
all frilled by the idea. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If this is to go forward it needs to be well-defined - handwaving simply |
| 21 |
isn't cutting it imo. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Regards, |
| 24 |
Bryan Østergaard |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives