| 1 |
On 09/04/16 13:53, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 05/04/16 03:19, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> Thoughts on any of this? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> The whole usr-merge moves the problem of putting stuff in / to putting |
| 7 |
>> the very same stuff in the initrd when something different from busybox |
| 8 |
>> (or equivalent) is needed to get the early boot mounting. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Do we have a reliable way to address this now? |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Put the very same stuff in the initramfs? Most initramfs creation |
| 14 |
> scripts should already do this automatically, and with compat symlinks |
| 15 |
> even those that don't probably will still end up doing it anyway.. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The question is different: do they work reliably? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
usr-merge does not solve any problem in itself (and it is totally |
| 20 |
backwards, if somebody wants to simplify would do /usr -> /), but makes |
| 21 |
more evident that you might need lots of the userspace to successfully |
| 22 |
complete your early boot. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
lu |
Archives