| 1 |
* Alan <alan@×××××.org> [021108 21:24]: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Just my $0.02 about bogofilter.... |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
>The two limitations of bogofilter that need to be addressed someone are: |
| 7 |
> 1 can only "interact" with it through mutt or some custom hacking |
| 8 |
> through other programs (I think that emacs vm can notify |
| 9 |
> spam/non-spam with bogofilter if you know the right spell) |
| 10 |
> 2 needs enough spam and non-spam to properly set up the word lists. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
>However, if 2 is done right, then 1 isn't a real problem. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
>Anyway, that's my $0.02/testimonial :) Spread the love! |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You're right on your observations, but as you have already seen |
| 17 |
yourself, the power which comes with Bayesian filters has its drawback, |
| 18 |
that being that you need to train them. The more spam and good mail you |
| 19 |
feed to the filter, the better it'll work. |
| 20 |
That also means that each person will have its own words database suited |
| 21 |
to the kind of spam and good mail each one receives. |
| 22 |
As to the need for mutt, it really makes things nicer, but I0m confident |
| 23 |
that other MUA might use it somehow too. I use Mutt, though, so I cannot |
| 24 |
help with other apps. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Javier Marcet <jmarcet@×××××.com> |
Archives