1 |
Hello, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Jonas Jelten wrote: |
4 |
> Ohai! |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Phabricator is a fun adventure game: http://phabricator.org/ |
7 |
> It provides a tightly coupled set of project management tools. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Many bigger projects (e.g. blender, mediawiki, ...) started using |
10 |
> phabricator, it could also be very beneficial for gentoo. |
11 |
|
12 |
The website lists "Companies probably using Phabricator", which not a |
13 |
very good for transmitting trust. |
14 |
|
15 |
We've just been through major migrations: moving to git, website |
16 |
migration, etc. We should not forget all the work that has been put into |
17 |
making the current system work for Gentoo, and I have to say, I think that |
18 |
our new website looks really nice, gitweb looks great too, and we have a |
19 |
really large history of bugs on bugzilla, that also has a Gentoo theme. |
20 |
Migrating to something else would be a huge undertaking. That's why, |
21 |
even though I use and like Atlassian tools, I never proposed a migration |
22 |
to JIRA, bitbucket and other tools. If others would like moving to |
23 |
something else, I believe that Atlassian tools are more attractive. |
24 |
Yes, they are a proprietary company, but they do offer free licenses for |
25 |
open source projects that could be hosted on Gentoo Infra. |
26 |
|
27 |
https://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request |
28 |
|
29 |
That said, I'm not saying we should move to Atlassian tools, just that |
30 |
it's probably a better option than Phabricator, if such a big migration |
31 |
happens. I think that what we have now is already pretty good. |
32 |
|
33 |
> Migrating would contradict the apparent goal of integrating github more |
34 |
> tightly, but still we could consider to use Phabricator instead, |
35 |
> especially to dump bugzilla. |
36 |
|
37 |
While I'm not particularly against integrating more tightly with GitHub, |
38 |
there is no such goal in Gentoo as far as I can tell. As much as I like |
39 |
GitHub, I do understand the concerns of others about making GitHub |
40 |
essential. It has been blocked before in certain regions of the world, |
41 |
and that's not good for us, regardless of the free vs proprietary |
42 |
debate. I don't think that GitHub is evil or anything, but GitHub is a |
43 |
nice place for extras, to interact with the user community, receive |
44 |
patches, etc. It should not replace our own infra. |
45 |
|
46 |
Cheers, |
47 |
—Guilherme |