| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 5 |
> Neither set of rules is ideal. Ordering makes a lot of sense when you |
| 6 |
> just read it. Consider metadata with multiple maintainers and multiple |
| 7 |
> herds. Either you have to start assigning explicitly (requires editing |
| 8 |
> metadata.xml), or you need to fall back to ordering. If you're going to |
| 9 |
> do ordering further down, why not do it from the start and be done with |
| 10 |
> it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ok, I'm convinced. 5:) I tend not to prefer having "hidden" meanings, |
| 13 |
but as you point out XML is ordered, and you definitely made the case |
| 14 |
that it won't have a large impact. Fine by me... 5:) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Mike 5:) |
| 17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 18 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkljaG4ACgkQu7rWomwgFXq53gCeMRe+n+S6N2za00zuHjrge/gw |
| 21 |
nUIAniyeVK/RTlVUaR2Q3Eqw+5cCMIoU |
| 22 |
=01UN |
| 23 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives