| 1 |
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 18:14, Jason Huebel wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thursday 12 August 2004 4:49 pm, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Whats pending and this is getting old is somebody from releng unmasking |
| 4 |
> > the cascade aware catalyst-1.0.8.1-r1.ebuild. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Then what's with the /topic on the -dev channel saying we should be testing |
| 7 |
> cascading profiles for 2004.3? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> "please test cascading profiles...do it for 2004.3!" |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I think that's a nice way of saying "Nobody should add a flat 2004.3 |
| 12 |
profile for the next release cycle" |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I also recall seeing a post-2004.2-release email (from you) requesting testing |
| 16 |
> of the new catalyst that supports cascading. |
| 17 |
Yeah It's kinda discouraging that there has been no feedback on that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> Since I've been off for a |
| 20 |
> couple of weeks (as has several releng folks), I haven't tested the new |
| 21 |
> catalyst release. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
It works and it the stuff dreams are made of. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Are we pushing the userbase to cascading immediately? If so, this is all news |
| 26 |
> to me. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Yes thats is the goal. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
| 32 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |
Archives