| 1 |
> GitHub Inc. is successful because they host a central location with |
| 2 |
> "all the code on the Internet"; convenient for consumers and |
| 3 |
> producers alike. Of course it is a fallacy, but it's convenient |
| 4 |
> when it works. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Ensure that Gentoo accomplishes the same for Gentoo. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Do NOT - I repeat NOT - tie "user repos" to GitHub Inc., please do |
| 9 |
> not even bother working on a prototype there (looking at you James), |
| 10 |
> because if it is good enough it will stick, and as the social |
| 11 |
> contract rightfully states, it's important to remain independent, |
| 12 |
> so that Gentoo and Gentoo only can decide what it will offer. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> This is a wonderful idea which would benefit the community |
| 16 |
> tremendously. I wish I had time to implement all of it immediately. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Kind regards |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> //Peter |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
I agree with the idea of NOT using GitHub. Though it is a great |
| 24 |
resource, I second the idea that Gentoo should offer the repository |
| 25 |
space in order to stay separate. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Cheers, |
| 28 |
Nathan Zachary |
Archives