Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:55:55
Message-Id: 20111010210043.4b31d55e@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush by Samuli Suominen
1 On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:33:15 +0300
2 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I question
5 > your motives in picking this particular one. It's not like I expected
6 > cookies for the time I've put into this porting effort, but not this
7 > "attack" either.
8
9 Then stop trying to remove packages that have an active maintainer. I could
10 have sworn that was written down somewhere.
11
12
13 --
14 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
15 toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
16 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>