Re: Re[8]: [gentoo-dev] Decision to remove stage1/2 from installation documentation

[Ned Ludd]

On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 08:01 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 12:06 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> > BTW, I'd still like to know how I'll get nptl(only) hardened install once
> > stage1 is gone. i386 does not have nptl, and I've done change CHOST && emerge
> > -e system && emerge -e world job a couple of times and it never went smoothly.
>
> Please calm down. Chances are for 2006.0 hardened will no longer produce
> a set of 2.4.x stages, by providing 1 less set of stages it frees up
> some
> of our mirror space for providing a set if i386-gentoo-linux-gnu and a
> set of i686-gentoo-linux-gnu set of stages. If your start from a stage1
> and remove the hardened USE flags it's functionality the equivalent as
> starting from a vanilla set by the time you ./bootstrap.sh and then
> your emerge -e world would remove any remaining traces. Of course I
> think it's silly to remove the hardened USE flag.
>
>
> Please calm down. Chances are for 2006.0 hardened will no longer produce
> a set of 2.4.x stages, by providing 1 less set of stages it frees up
> some of our mirror space for providing a set if i386-gentoo-linux-gnu
> and a set of i686-gentoo-linux-gnu set of stages. If your start from a
> stage1 and remove the hardened USE flags it's functionality the
> equivalent as starting from a vanilla set by the time you ./bootstrap.sh
> and then your emerge -e world would remove any remaining traces. Of
> course I think it's silly to remove the hardened USE flag.
>
> You can have your cake and eat it too as long as catalyst support
> remains.


ha ok new rule for me. drink coffee before sending first mail of the
morn.


> --
> Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
> Gentoo Linux
>
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list