1 |
Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Ryan Hill wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
>> It doesn't. See freetype which requires >=fontconfig-2.3 at runtime |
6 |
>> which in turn requires freetype at runtime. Bug #179736. |
7 |
|
8 |
> I think the problem is that fontconfig has freetype not just in RDEPEND |
9 |
> but also DEPEND |
10 |
|
11 |
Doh. You're right of course. |
12 |
|
13 |
> P.S. I think the solution with PDEPEND is wrong for bug 179736. If I |
14 |
> understand it correctly, then >freetype-2.2 doesn't NEED |
15 |
> >=fontconfig-2.4, but, if installed, will crash older versions. Then |
16 |
> there should be a blocker on <fontconfig-2.4 in freetype. I think |
17 |
> portage handles that correctly since some point. And if not, it should :) |
18 |
|
19 |
I'm a firm believer that blockers absolutely suck and should be avoided |
20 |
at all costs. But in this case I don't see another way around it, since |
21 |
while playing around just now I discovered another way to break the |
22 |
depgraph with the current PDEPEND. |
23 |
|
24 |
Thanks for the advice. :) |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
dirtyepic salesman said this vacuum's guaranteed |
29 |
gentoo org it could suck an ancient virus from the sea |
30 |
9B81 6C9F E791 83BB 3AB3 5B2D E625 A073 8379 37E8 (0x837937E8) |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |