1 |
(apologies in advance if this goes through twice) |
2 |
|
3 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
4 |
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:18 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
>> Should arch testers start working with 4.1.1 then? And do you want bugs to |
7 |
>> block #117482? |
8 |
|
9 |
> Arch testers should contact their architecture's leads or Release |
10 |
> Engineering Architecture Coordinator. As for bug reports, yes. |
11 |
|
12 |
Just an update - I've finished most major desktop stuff for x86 without any |
13 |
problems. I'm moving onto stuff that's already on the tracker and is fixed in |
14 |
testing but not stable. Rather than open and track a ton of new bugs, I'd like |
15 |
to reopen the original ~arch bugs and request a backport or stabilization at the |
16 |
maintainer's discretion. |
17 |
|
18 |
Is this okay, or would people rather get a shiny new bug? Keep in mind there |
19 |
are already 290 bugs on the tracker. Alternatively, would it be better to just |
20 |
start a new tracker bug for stabilization? |
21 |
|
22 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117482 |
23 |
|
24 |
--de. |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |