| 1 |
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:07:03 -0700 |
| 2 |
"Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 4. If we have a valid category name, but no valid package atoms (this |
| 5 |
> may be a new or misspelt package), try to figure out which team might |
| 6 |
> want it. Use the category-level metadata.xml file. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I wonder how often this will do the right thing. Not to mention many |
| 9 |
categories don't have a team (eg. app-doc) and many have multiple teams |
| 10 |
(eg. media-libs). In fact, I don't see anyone using category-level |
| 11 |
metadata.xml for anything but category descriptions right now. |
| 12 |
Assigning bugs that don't have a valid package name to bug-wranglers |
| 13 |
for some human intervention might work better. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gcc-porting, by design, by neglect |
| 18 |
treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect |
| 19 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives