| 1 |
2017-02-03 10:52 GMT+01:00 Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@g.o>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:32:30 +0100 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >On 02/03/2017 10:10 AM, Benda Xu wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> writes: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >>> I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like |
| 9 |
> >>> what I see. |
| 10 |
> >>> |
| 11 |
> >>> I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to |
| 12 |
> >>> the meson build system [3]. |
| 13 |
> >>> |
| 14 |
> >>> As I said on the bug, the downside is the addition of py3 and ninja |
| 15 |
> >>> as build time dependencies, but I think the upside (a build system |
| 16 |
> >>> where we don't have to worry about parallel make issues or |
| 17 |
> >>> portability) outweighs that. |
| 18 |
> >>> |
| 19 |
> >>> What do folks think here? |
| 20 |
> >> |
| 21 |
> >> I would discourage it. Making OpenRC build-depend on python |
| 22 |
> >> introduces unnecessary complexity that will undermine the |
| 23 |
> >> portability of OpenRC sooner or later. |
| 24 |
> >> |
| 25 |
> >> After all OpenRC is a small program easy to build with a hand-written |
| 26 |
> >> Makefile. |
| 27 |
> >> |
| 28 |
> >> Parallel make issues? No problem let's just solve it. |
| 29 |
> >> |
| 30 |
> >> |
| 31 |
> >> Please, keep it simple. |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> >I'm adding my support to this sentiment |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> +1 |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> -- |
| 40 |
> Lars Wendler |
| 41 |
> Gentoo package maintainer |
| 42 |
> GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> Attention! New gpg key! See |
| 45 |
> https://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Replay @ random using gmail webmail interface; |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
May be worth mentioning that also other distro like Alpine Linux uses |
| 51 |
openrc, they can be interested |
Archives