| 1 |
On Thu, 2020-03-19 at 14:57 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:59:25 -0500 |
| 3 |
> William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Sure, but if you run into something like that you just don't use the |
| 6 |
> > noarch keyword for those packages. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> But as soon as this happens, all dependent packages that are noarch |
| 9 |
> will need to also transition to not using no-arch. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> So it turns into a lot of busywork without benefit. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Second this, it doesn't sound well though out at this point. |
Archives