Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: Georgi Georgiev <chutz-dated-1062150848.9c9d54dce6d5@×××.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev List <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 12:09:26
Message-Id: 1060947979.6937.2.camel@rattus.Localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's by Georgi Georgiev
1 I agree with the negative connotation snapshop, but so is a forever rc
2 candidate. How about checkpoint like the database boys do? - its prob
3 the most correct measure of gentoos status.
4
5 BillK
6
7 On Fri, 2003-08-15 at 17:54, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
8 > On 15/08/2003 at 11:44:21(+0200), Camille Huot used 1.0K just to say:
9
10 >
11 > I associate the word "snapshots" with something incomplete. That's because the
12 > word is mostly used by projects that offer cvs snapshots. I agree that it is
13 > the most correct name, even though it may not be the most descriptive one.
14 --
15 William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
16
17
18 --
19 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list