| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 14. Dezember 2017, 13:21:47 CET schrieb Fabian Groffen: |
| 2 |
> Can we make it a policy to list /what/ QA issues are the justification |
| 3 |
> for commits like these? A description in the commit message would be |
| 4 |
> preferred, but a pointer to a location where said issues can be found |
| 5 |
> would do too. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Thanks, |
| 8 |
> Fabian |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> On 14-12-2017 12:10:59 +0000, Andreas Hüttel wrote: |
| 11 |
> > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=34e2c43f |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
That would have been a good thing to do, yes. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Unfortunately I was between two meetings, just saw the message on #gentoo-qa |
| 16 |
that someone had committed straight to m-n, and if it could be reverted by |
| 17 |
someone with tree access, and decided to quickly help out. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
(And adding a new package straight to m-n is in my opinion enough reason for |
| 20 |
an immediate revert.) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
That said I think we have sorted out things in the meantime. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 26 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 28 |
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
Archives