| 1 |
El vie, 27-03-2015 a las 21:03 +0000, Robin H. Johnson escribió: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 09:45:25PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > El mié, 25-03-2015 a las 21:25 +0000, Robin H. Johnson escribió: |
| 4 |
> > [...] |
| 5 |
> > > - timeout: |
| 6 |
> > > this is how long you we suggest you wait for the maintainer/team to |
| 7 |
> > > comment on your change. |
| 8 |
> > > Format should be a short duration specifier per ISO8601 |
| 9 |
> > > I'd like to default it to 1 week: 'P1W'. |
| 10 |
> > [...] |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I would establish a maximum here to prevent people from "avoiding" any |
| 13 |
> > changes by others setting, for example, the value to 1 year and, once |
| 14 |
> > the issue is completely ignored, blaming on not following the |
| 15 |
> > metadata.xml rules :| |
| 16 |
> Ok, what's a reasonable max that doesn't block progress? |
| 17 |
> P6M? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I would prefer 1M (well... if the developer is not able to even comment |
| 21 |
in bug reports in 1 month, maybe he should have at least a devaway |
| 22 |
message explaining how to deal with his/her packages if he is not able |
| 23 |
to reply so "soon") :/ |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Anyway, that is my personal opinion of course, maybe other would prefer |
| 26 |
3M or similar :| |
Archives