1 |
On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Saturday 02 March 2013 20:50:17 Markos Chandras wrote: |
4 |
> > On Mar 3, 2013 1:43 AM, "Mike Frysinger" <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > > On Friday 01 March 2013 07:45:28 Markos Chandras wrote: |
6 |
> > > > On 1 March 2013 08:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > vapier 13/03/01 08:16:02 |
8 |
> > > > > |
9 |
> > > > > Modified: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog |
10 |
> > > > > Log: |
11 |
> > > > > Add arm lovin. |
12 |
> > > > > |
13 |
> > > > > --- confuse-2.7.ebuild 30 Oct 2012 11:18:49 -0000 1.12 |
14 |
> > > > > +++ confuse-2.7.ebuild 1 Mar 2013 08:16:02 -0000 1.13 |
15 |
> > > > > |
16 |
> > > > > -KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc x86 |
17 |
> > > > > ~sparc-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~x86-interix ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux |
18 |
> > > > > ~ppc-macos ~x86-macos ~x86-solaris" +KEYWORDS="alpha amd64 arm |
19 |
hppa |
20 |
> > > > > ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sparc |
21 |
> > > > > x86 ~sparc-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~x86-interix ~amd64-linux ~x86-linux |
22 |
> > > > > ~ppc-macos ~x86-macos ~x86-solaris" |
23 |
> > > > |
24 |
> > > > straight to stable? Not even keeping it to testing just for a week |
25 |
or |
26 |
> > > so? |
27 |
> > > |
28 |
> > > looks that way |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > Ok good to know you break the rules on purpose |
31 |
> |
32 |
> complain to me when all these arm systems that totally had confuse already |
33 |
> installed go down in fire. it literally makes 0 difference here. |
34 |
> -mike |
35 |
|
36 |
Why would they have it installed (in stable) if it had no keywords? and if |
37 |
it is such an important package why it didn't have testing keywords in the |
38 |
first place? I did't say it broke something, it just feels strange and this |
39 |
is why I asked |