| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On April 12, 2004 01:19 pm, Norberto Bensa wrote: |
| 5 |
> Tom St Denis wrote: |
| 6 |
> > I started using gentoo [~60k files in portage] to now [~80k files in |
| 7 |
> > portage] it's definitely not just a linear amount slower. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> rsync isn't slow. "emerge --sync" is slow in the portage cache updates |
| 10 |
> stage (I really want to know what portage cache update does :-/ ) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Syncs can be slow too. Sometimes they zoom but sometimes it will say things |
| 13 |
like |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
200 files ...... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
and twirl..... and twirl......and twirl...... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Point is portage is useable and works decent. Updating is a bitch and |
| 20 |
occasionally a "world" update takes way too long [to get the package list]. |
| 21 |
It's a manner of being scaleable. Portage isn't. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Tom |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQFAetA0sP+tEsHHY0ARAuJIAJ9jfAozHPtz2o49wiNQdni1FYU5FgCZAefS |
| 28 |
+qb63BEv19W73J6HN6v06WA= |
| 29 |
=CRvw |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives