| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:30:24 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>| OK, so kernel-2.eclass is abusing the slot as well, go scream on |
| 5 |
>| kernel devs. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>No. kernel-2 installs sources, not an actual package. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>| > | Yeah, it checks for that since that's the way the eclass is |
| 10 |
>| > | designed. You can't declare a slot in a kernel ebuild either. |
| 11 |
>| |
| 12 |
>| > One is a design flaw. The other is not. |
| 13 |
>| |
| 14 |
>| Ah, tell me about the dual standards :P |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
>Not dual standards at all. There's nothing wrong with saying "don't do |
| 17 |
>x unless you're doing y", with appropriate justification. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>| > | Well, starts to be boring - so, either come with something valid |
| 20 |
>| > | from QA standpoint or stop now. |
| 21 |
>| |
| 22 |
>| > This is a valid issue from a QA standpoint. This is also why I'm not |
| 23 |
>| > going to waste my time doing a proper list -- rather than addressing |
| 24 |
>| > issues, they are being passed off as irrelevant or even features. |
| 25 |
>| |
| 26 |
>| Next time, rather think a couple of times up before claiming |
| 27 |
>| something very broken on a public mailing list where you have no |
| 28 |
>| proof for such claims. Will be immensely helpful for everyone |
| 29 |
>| involved. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
>No proof? |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
>Sheesh, you'll probably claim that this isn't broken next too: |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> if [ "${IS_UPGRADE}" = "1" ] ; then |
| 36 |
> einfo "Removing old version ${REMOVE_PKG}" |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> emerge -C "${REMOVE_PKG}" |
| 39 |
> fi |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
Semantics of the logic aside, calling emerge from within an ebuild is a |
| 44 |
BIG nono. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
-Alec Warner |
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives