Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:04:56
Message-Id: 200602281459.42324.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role by Renat Lumpau
1 On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:51, Renat Lumpau wrote:
2 > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:11:57PM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 > > And it sticks out a nasty ewarn and says that the ebuild is probably
4 > > broken.
5 >
6 > Which it _probably_ is. See, this is a numbers game. In most cases, if you
7 > use the webapp eclass, setting SLOT="0" is incorrect. There are some cases
8 > in which it's just fine. Until FEATURES="mindreader" is implemented, how is
9 > the eclass to know what you're trying to do? So it prints a warning and
10 > doesn't die. Number of angry users storming bugs.g.o - 0.
11
12 why do you need to be a mindreader ? the user requested they control the
13 package, thus it isnt a bug, so dont issue a warning
14 -mike
15 --
16 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>