1 |
On Friday 25 June 2004 07:22 pm, Sven Köhler wrote: |
2 |
> For example there are the gcc3.2/3.3 ebuilds, and the libstdc++-ebuild |
3 |
> that supply the same libstdc++ versions. |
4 |
|
5 |
if they have the same name down to the version number, they are supposed to |
6 |
binary compatible and i see no reason we should try to work around that |
7 |
|
8 |
> The same case perhaps applies to gcc2.9 and lib-compat - don't they |
9 |
> supply the same libstdc++ versions? |
10 |
|
11 |
uhh file a bug maybe ? |
12 |
-mike |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |