| 1 |
On 8 Jun 2008, at 11:12, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Hello, |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I |
| 6 |
> have a few technical questions for you: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> 1. GLEP54 |
| 9 |
> 2. GLEP55 |
| 10 |
> 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> [1] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0054.html |
| 13 |
> [2] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0055.html |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Hi, |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I already argued in favour of both GLEP54 and GLEP55 in a council |
| 18 |
meeting. I'm eager to know what real problems people have with those. |
| 19 |
Until now, we've only seen stupid complains such as: 'changing |
| 20 |
extension breaks my shitty scripts', 'it looks weird', 'I don't |
| 21 |
understand what you are talking about, yet I want to comment', 'but |
| 22 |
scm means something else for me'... |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Other than that, I'm looking forward to both GLEPs being accepted |
| 25 |
whether I make it to the council or not. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
With respect to future EAPIs, from the top of my head, I'd like Gentoo |
| 28 |
to have: |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
* USE dependencies. |
| 31 |
* Suggested dependencies. |
| 32 |
* Blockers information to the package manager. |
| 33 |
* Proper SCM integration with the package manager. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
- ferdy-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives