Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Improvements to the GLEP workflow
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:16:20
Message-Id: 1244664918.3388.0@NeddySeagoon
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP] Improvements to the GLEP workflow by Mark Bateman
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 2009.06.09 22:49, Mark Bateman wrote:
5 > ABSTRACT
6 > This GLEP details a possible enhancement to the GLEP process to aid
7 > the Gentoo
8 > council in voting on GLEPs as well Gentoo developers in the creation
9 > of GLEPs.
10 >
11 >
12 [snip]
13
14 Mark,
15
16 Sounds good to me. There are signs the council is already moving
17 this way. e.g. the feature freeze on EAPI 3 and the acknowledgement of
18 the problem described by GLEP55 are two examples of the stepwise
19 approach to problem solving.
20
21 - --
22 Regards,
23
24 Roy Bamford
25 (NeddySeagoon) a member of
26 gentoo-ops
27 forum-mods
28 treecleaners
29 trustees
30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
31 Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
32
33 iEYEARECAAYFAkowFFYACgkQTE4/y7nJvau84gCdFOLQgnOc6SyBn631cecGHqeC
34 YdMAn0VWPtk0JFFW87CpVw7nAr9mo7vn
35 =lztM
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----