Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Reffett <geekboy72@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:52:05
Message-Id: 4F9D9B98.6090201@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-embedded/tigcc needs an urgent bump by Pacho Ramos
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 04/29/12 07:48, Pacho Ramos wrote:
5 > El lun, 23-04-2012 a las 20:35 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
6 >> Our stable versions are broken for a long time, they even don't compile,
7 >> but we cannot stable latest testing version because of a buffer overflow
8 >> problem. A bump could help, but looks like embedded team doesn't have
9 >> enough time for it. Is anybody interested in taking care of it?
10 >>
11 >> Its bugs:
12 >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=tigcc&list_id=978701
13 >>
14 >> Thanks
15 >
16 > Or maybe we should simply treeclean it if nobody is willing to
17 > fix/maintain it and since nothing in the tree needs it...
18 >
19 I've submitted what I hope is fix for the buffer overflow problem to bug
20 337059. Will that be sufficient to remove the block on stabilization?
21 - --Chris Reffett
22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
24 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
25
26 iEYEARECAAYFAk+dm5gACgkQ23laikJhg1Q2aQCeOOHS3tB0gVfCxQ79ldSBMV3N
27 gEYAn3Ek1hpIhU/CSjsLxMEa13bx8R0t
28 =0uOv
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----