| 1 |
On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 15:39 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:27:25 -0400 Chris Gianelloni |
| 3 |
> <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | Well, simply making it so that a USE flag can only belong to one group |
| 5 |
> | or no groups. There are plenty of things that can be taken this way. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Again, that's another arbitrary annoying constraint. I'd rather have no |
| 8 |
> -@GROUP than no duplicates. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> | Also, local USE flags should definitely never be included in groups. |
| 11 |
> | I'm not sure if you had specified that. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Got a really good reason why not? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Because local USE flags should remain in the local package scope and not |
| 16 |
be brought into the global scope... unless you want to allow local USE |
| 17 |
grouping, too. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 21 |
Release Engineering - Operational/QA Manager |
| 22 |
Games - Developer |
| 23 |
Gentoo Linux |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives