| 1 |
On 06/15/2014 02:05 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> I vote that as primary policy/general practice, it only be bumped for |
| 3 |
> (2) -- the primary purpose of subslot rebuilds is to allow portage to |
| 4 |
> figure out the deptree order when a dependency upgrade is going to |
| 5 |
> break a package that may or may not be emerged later. "break" is the |
| 6 |
> key term here. If users want to re-emerge the rdeps of a package on |
| 7 |
> upgrade they can certainly do so, but I don't see this as something we |
| 8 |
> want to force on everybody just because we can... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I agree 100%. |
Archives