Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To:	gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2012 20:07:35
Message-Id:	`20120510205940.544bbc0f@googlemail.com`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012] by Markos Chandras

1	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2	Hash: SHA1
3
4	On Thu, 10 May 2012 20:55:02 +0100
5	Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
6	> Make a constructive criticism if you really need to rant about
7	> software that nobody forces you to use.
8
9	Not that I agree with anything Fabio has ever said, but I believe the
10	issue under discussion here is that tight coupling and vertical
11	integration means we are in effect forced to use rather a lot of
12	software that we would prefer not to.
13
14	- --
15	Ciaran McCreesh
16	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17	Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
18
19	iEYEARECAAYFAk+sHi8ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGZoQCeN5o15CIzO0xJTCNkOW9EhPoc
20	rjgAoL5WoPQpcxRhceifxFkfecZg5YqK
21	=+nyf
22	-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Subject	Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Tightly-coupled core distro [was: Council meeting summary for 3 April 2012]	"Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>