| 1 |
23:37:25 <willikins> rej, you have notes! [21:13] <mrueg> Let me |
| 2 |
rephrase this: Just a friendly notice to please refrain from rephrasing |
| 3 |
bug summaries from "Stabilize ${P}" to "${P} stable req". This just |
| 4 |
adds unneeded noise to the bug. I don't want this on bugs I've reported |
| 5 |
or am assigned to. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
This is my equally short and "friendly" note: It's not going to happen. |
| 9 |
Forget about it. They are not "your" bug reports and anyone is |
| 10 |
actually /welcome/ to improve them. Get used to it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
To get technical on the "improvement" bit, we have agreed time on time |
| 13 |
that stating the atom and then the action is the way to go. The main |
| 14 |
reasons is that it helps people who need to regularly read /lists/ of |
| 15 |
bug summaries sort them better. Until we get a specific [Atoms] field |
| 16 |
implemented, it will need to stay this way. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Besides the finer technical points of bug maintenance, it simply |
| 19 |
infuriates me that anyone would think of bug reports in the possessive. |
| 20 |
This is not the way to improve the distro. You're on the wrong track |
| 21 |
there. And you weren't being friendly. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
No kind regards to the sender, |
| 25 |
jer |
Archives