| 1 |
On Thursday 10 June 2004 22:11, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> The possibility of having an official Gentoo port are pretty much |
| 3 |
> non-existent so long as there is a question of the legality of such a |
| 4 |
> port. We cannot allow ourselves to be liable in breaking laws. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I do not understand this concern regarding the legality of the xbox gentoo |
| 7 |
effort. Can you state specifically what your concerns are, and which laws you |
| 8 |
think are being broken? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
btw, IBM *may* have added some derivative code to the linux kernel. Using your |
| 11 |
argument, should we remove the kernel sources pending outcome of the court |
| 12 |
case? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives