Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: FEATURES="binchecks strip" for plain file packages e.g. latex, perl, python | ||
| Date: | Sat, 21 Sep 2013 14:39:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | l1kb1u$tr3$1@ger.gmane.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: FEATURES="binchecks strip" for plain file packages e.g. latex, perl, python by "Michał Górny" |
||
| 1 | On 22/09/2013 00:26, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 | > This is just another of portage's deviations from the standard. PMS |
| 3 | > doesn't list RESTRICT=binchecks, and I suppose this makes using it in |
| 4 | > the tree at least a little wrong. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | It does however say: "Package managers may recognise other tokens, but |
| 7 | ebuilds may not rely upon them being supported." |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Since it's just another variable that doesn't actually affect the ebuild |
| 10 | or other package managers, it's no problem. |