Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Old changelogs / eclass dir
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 21:51:37
Message-Id: 20111031160027.387b291e@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Old changelogs / eclass dir by Markos Chandras
1 On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 08:39:39 +0000
2 Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5 > Hash: SHA512
6 >
7 > On 10/31/2011 05:45 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
8 > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:46:30 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel"
9 > > <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
10 > >
11 > >> Dear all,
12 > >>
13 > >> two small suggestions regarding ChangeLogs:
14 > >>
15 > >> 1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory? In my
16 > >> personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
17 > >> reasons... Should we still start one?
18 > >>
19 > >> 2) I'd like to suggest that for changelogs that grow beyond a
20 > >> certain size (e.g. profiles/ChangeLog) the file is "rotated"
21 > >> similar to /var/log logfiles. I.e. the current file is renamed
22 > >> with a date extension and a new file is started. This has the
23 > >> benefit that the archived file is static and will never be
24 > >> retransmitted by rsync.
25 > >
26 > > I like both suggestions. Maybe we could split by year? That way
27 > > the old non-conforming entries would just go into the oldest log.
28 > > Delaying rotation by one year (ie. the first entry in 2012 would
29 > > cause entries in 2010 to be split off) would prevent getting a
30 > > bunch of empty changelogs Jan 1st.
31 > >
32 > >
33 > There is always the problem with abandoned (but working) packages
34 > which may have no commits in > 2 years. We'll end up with empty
35 > ChangeLogs.
36
37 notifempty
38 minsize 5k
39
40
41 --
42 fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense
43 toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime
44 @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature