| 1 |
Gold is Heavy wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>root@void2 portage # depmod -e |
| 4 |
>depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.10/kernel/drivers/block/nbd.o |
| 5 |
>depmod: preempt_schedule |
| 6 |
>depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.10/kernel/drivers/char/ftape/lowlevel/ftape.o |
| 7 |
>depmod: preempt_schedule |
| 8 |
>depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.10/kernel/drivers/char/ftape/zftape/zftape.o |
| 9 |
>depmod: preempt_schedule |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>[more of the same snipped] |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
>This output is definitely better than -a. I did see kernel preemtpion patch being applied, however, I didn't think there were any problems with it? Maybe I am wrong. What can I check? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>Processor Type and Features: |
| 16 |
>[*] Preemptible Kernel |
| 17 |
>[*] APIC and IO-APIC support on uniprocessors |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
>This is what I have enabled currently, that I think is related to the preemption patch. Did I miss something else? |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
These are the dependency errors I was complaining about a few days |
| 22 |
ago to drobbins. This was with the -r0 version of linux-sources-2.4.10, |
| 23 |
though, and now there is a -r3. If you haven't make sure and check that |
| 24 |
out, and I will do the same. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Chad |
Archives