Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update to news item 2014-10-26-gcc_4_7_introduced_new_c++11_abi/2014-10-26-gcc_4_7_introduced_new_c++11_abi.en.txt
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2017 16:11:59
Message-Id: CAJ0EP42_3oSxpfPu5tOyM9ApXxjXg4z+8sXBUJ7VF80xYaHxHA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Update to news item 2014-10-26-gcc_4_7_introduced_new_c++11_abi/2014-10-26-gcc_4_7_introduced_new_c++11_abi.en.txt by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Anthony G. Basile <blueness@g.o> wrote:
2 > Hi everyone,
3 >
4 > Kensington suggested updating the news item on the new c++11 abi for
5 > gcc. Since this news item now appears for all new installations of gcc
6 > it can be annoying. I'm proposing to change it as below, but I have one
7 > concern. It is important for anyone upgrading from gcc-4 to gcc-5. But
8 > if an upgrade to gcc-5 removes gcc-4, then the message won't show up
9 > while it is still relevant.
10 >
11 > Any suggestions on how to proceed?
12
13 Nit: You probably want <sys-devel/gcc-5, not <=sys-devel/gcc-5.
14
15 Portage will flag the news item as relevant as soon as it sees gcc-4*
16 installed. If a future depclean removes that version, I believe
17 portage will still display the news item. Even if it doesn't, the user
18 would still have had to ignore the news item and run the depclean
19 first.