1 |
On Freitag, 12. Oktober 2018 14:50:55 CEST Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> ARM is not a Gentoo security supported arch. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> If the ARM maintainers feel that stable keywords make the lives of |
5 |
> their users better, and it isn't causing problems for anybody else, |
6 |
> I'm not sure why we should be interfering with this. |
7 |
|
8 |
That's interesting. If it's not security supported, does that mean we can |
9 |
simply clean up vulnerable versions and drop every arm revdep to ~arm? |
10 |
|
11 |
Or are we supposed to keep vulnerable versions around and drop every keyword |
12 |
except arm? |
13 |
|
14 |
Either way means extra care for this arch. |