| 1 |
On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:24:20 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 31 May 2017 08:55:17 +0200 |
| 5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > For example: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > foo? ( bar ) |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > would mean 'if you have USE=foo, then USE=bar is enabled as well'. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> What about "if bar cannot be enabled, then turn foo off"? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
You ask a constructivist who'll yell at you saying that 'foo -> bar' is |
| 16 |
not equivalent to '!bar -> !foo'. You'll have to write the latter as |
| 17 |
well if you want that. |
Archives