| 1 |
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 09:12 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:08:47 +0100 |
| 3 |
> "Denis Dupeyron" <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > No. What he meant and doesn't dare to say is you didn't ask, but |
| 5 |
> > demanded, in your usual dry and pesky "I'm a spoiled 6-year old" tone. |
| 6 |
> > And this as usual results in people ignoring you. People aren't as |
| 7 |
> > stupid as you think they are, and they don't want to play this game |
| 8 |
> > with you anymore. So don't build a case on the fact that you're not |
| 9 |
> > getting answers. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Someday you'll understand this. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Oh, and council members too aren't as stupid as you think they are. If |
| 14 |
> > they decide to discuss this, one of their first steps will surely be |
| 15 |
> > to try and evaluate what the current situation is. If I were a council |
| 16 |
> > member I'd probably feel offended by such condescension from your |
| 17 |
> > part. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Ah, so this is what you consider to be solid technical reasoning, is |
| 20 |
> it? You certainly present a compelling case, but probably not for |
| 21 |
> the position you were trying to... |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
This kind of conversation is not technical at all... Ciaranm, are you a |
| 25 |
MIPS user? If so, do you think that running KEYWORDS="mips" is less |
| 26 |
likely to result in breakage than running KEYWORDS="~mips"? |
Archives