| 1 |
On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 05:27, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 05:19 -0700, gmt@×××××.us escribió: |
| 4 |
>> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013, at 02:31, Pacho Ramos thusly quipped: |
| 5 |
>>> Due ramereth lack of time: |
| 6 |
>>> net-misc/stunnel |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> Pretty sure my (dead, eventually to be revived) server uses stunnel. I've never |
| 9 |
> officially maintained anything, is there some documentation somewhere as to |
| 10 |
> what exactly I'm agreeing to, if I take on proxy maintainer-ship? Also, of how |
| 11 |
> proxy maintainer-ship actually works? I.e.: would I need some particular person |
| 12 |
> to agree to be my commit-bitch or can I just sign off on patches, somehow, and |
| 13 |
> expect a pool of commit-bitches to magically push commits for me? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> -gmt |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I think you will need to simply contact proxy-maint people (CCing them) |
| 19 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/proxy-maintainers/ |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Maybe I shouldn't do this just yet. I need to figure out whether the box in question gets its stunnel from gentoo or some other distribution (it has a severe multiple personality disorder). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
If I take on maintainer-ship and it turns out I don't actually use the ebuild in-house, dereliction of duty on my part is almost an inevitability. On the other hand, if I am relying on the ebuild, I'll almost certainly want to proxy-maintain, once I get my hardware issues sorted out. There'd be no problem resurrecting it from the grave, if need be, would there? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-gmt |
Archives