| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 5 |
> And why is this a good thing? I'm adamantly against building the non-glx |
| 6 |
> libGL here for standard use, and I will continue to oppose it. Be normal |
| 7 |
> people and do the same thing as everybody else in the world who's ever |
| 8 |
> used libGL in X. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
To give you some more concrete information: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
1) The GLX one is almost certain to perform better in software |
| 13 |
2) The standalone one definitely won't support ffb or any other form of |
| 14 |
DRI (obviously), and building two libGL's is just silly. |
| 15 |
3) When accelerated indirect rendering works, the standalone won't work |
| 16 |
with it either. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Donnie |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFC+5KoXVaO67S1rtsRAnN2AKDY/kP6hOdNZsBLSASipXZ3gJ3/MQCgn/7D |
| 24 |
1UdMjcZoBLAfg1yXNwd1hcc= |
| 25 |
=Q0UM |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives