1 |
> > > I think one solution would be to force |
2 |
> > > an update to the latest version of dependencies. It would go around any |
3 |
> > > binary problems like this, but it still wouldn't be pretty. |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Only if the binary was built against the latest version of dependencies! |
6 |
> > If it was built against (in this case) openssl-0.9.6, then you'd be |
7 |
> > creating the problem you're trying to solve. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> We could just set the RDEPEND in the binary packages to be >= the versions |
10 |
> installed on the system that compiled the package. |
11 |
|
12 |
Nope, this won't work, for the building-against-openssl-0.9.6-but- |
13 |
deploying-against-openssl-0.9.7 reasons. |
14 |
|
15 |
-- |
16 |
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |