| 1 |
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 03:50:38PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14 Feb 2016 15:47, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 2/14/16 3:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > the bring up of the daemon itself is not nearly as important as the |
| 5 |
> > > runtime interaction of people using libudev or rules being executed. |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > correct and i've been careful with libudev. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > anyhow, can we divert this away from udev/eudev. mike what do you |
| 10 |
> > recommend as the future of openrc once systemd-udev can no longer be |
| 11 |
> > extracted. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> if/when systemd-udev can't be extract anymore, then sys-fs/udev is dead, |
| 14 |
> and this whole thread is fairly moot. |
| 15 |
> -mike |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
+1. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
And, as for right now, udev-229 is in the tree, so udev can still be |
| 20 |
extracted and run standalone from systemd. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
William |
Archives