Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Omkhar Arasaratnam <omkhar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 14:08:55
Message-Id: 4278D772.70709@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: Antwort: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo could become certified for IBM Server Hardware by "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
5
6 > I was just going to say something similar, although I'm not an
7 > employee of IBM. Gentoo's parent organization is non-profit, and
8 > IBM is a for-profit international corporation. That means, at least
9 > in the USA, that any such agreement would need to be negotiated and
10 > approved by what Stan Freberg referred to as "a battery of
11 > white-lipped attorneys". I was surprised to see Debian on the
12 > original list for the same reason. Can someone confirm there is
13 > actually an IBM certification for Debian?
14 >
15 > BTW, here in the USA, for all practical purposes, if you want a
16 > corporate blessing for Linux on a particular hardware platform,
17 > your choices are pretty much constrained to Red Hat Enterprise
18 > Linux. IBM, HP and Dell I believe all have corporate agreements
19 > with Red Hat, and I wasn't even aware of SUSE being present in the
20 > approved list. The only other "corporate blessed Linux" I know of
21 > is the Wal-Mart low end PC that comes with Linspire loaded on it.
22 >
23 > Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
24 >
25 >> daniel.kerwin@×××××××.de wrote:
26 >>
27 >>> First of all there are a lot of questions to answer:
28 >>
29 >>> - Who can do the certification? - What must be done to become
30 >>> certified? - What hardwaretypes will IBM offer? - Will the
31 >>> hardware stay at IBM or somewhere else?
32 >>
33 >>> Aside all IBM customers should request support for Gentoo from
34 >>> IBM because they'll only take this serious if many customers
35 >>> request support.
36 >>
37 >> Being an IBM employee in my day job I can provide some insight
38 >> here.
39 >>
40 >> NO
41 >>
42 >> ;-)
43 >>
44 >> I have an extremely hard time believing that IBM would endorse a
45 >> community supported distro. The only distros that IBM supports
46 >> are corporate backed (RedHat, Suse, Turbo). So unless Gentoo is
47 >> under going a major change in the near future. That said - I'm
48 >> frequently wrong ;-) But hey, let us know what you find out
49 >>
50 >> -- Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer omkhar@g.o
51 >> - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux:
52 >> http://ppc64.gentoo.org
53 >
54 >
55 It's definately possible that we're comparing apples to oranges here.
56
57 What *EXACTLY* is meant by support?
58 1. Will IBM throw some h/w to Gentoo for free - yes.
59 2. Will IBM assist with packaging some utilities if we raise enough of
60 a stink - maybe
61 3. Will IBM assist a customer with break/fix, SLA'ed support or
62 preload Gentoo on any server - hell no
63
64 What do we mean by "support". Please bear in mind IBM DOES NOT support
65 Debian in this fashion AFAIK. IBM may assist with development to some
66 small extent but if a customer calls in and ask for support - they're
67 up a creek.
68
69 So what are we looking for ? Like I stated before, IBM only officially
70 supports RHEL, SLES, Turbo Linux.
71
72
73 - --
74 Omkhar Arasaratnam - Gentoo PPC64 Developer
75 omkhar@g.o - http://dev.gentoo.org/~omkhar
76 Gentoo Linux / PPC64 Linux: http://ppc64.gentoo.org
77 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
78 Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
79
80 iD8DBQFCeNdy9msUWjh2lHURAkZ2AKCu2o1atwFjCC7RJ0dGjFjGAP8b5gCfRsNx
81 SWcpvT6bEpWi3CrqvFRux0A=
82 =RbbS
83 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
84
85
86 --
87 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies