Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-3.1 stable | ||
| Date: | Tue, 02 Apr 2013 13:34:03 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20130402133357.12179.qmail@stuge.se | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-3.1 stable by Samuli Suominen |
||
| 1 | Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 2 | > imho, |
| 3 | .. |
| 4 | > we should stick to the "latest stable is the stable" mantra |
| 5 | > (i'm not sure if this is even documented anywhere? and propably |
| 6 | > should not be? keep it as maintainer specific decision like it's now?) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | If it's the agreen-upon way then why not document it? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | //Peter |