| 1 |
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:37:41 -0400 Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| > They're not relevant to this discussion. We're not discussing what |
| 4 |
| > the right solution is, we're discussing why Sunrise is the wrong |
| 5 |
| > solution. There's a hell of a difference -- as an illustration, |
| 6 |
| > most people could tell you why giving everybody nukes is the wrong |
| 7 |
| > way to get peace in the middle east, but very few could tell you |
| 8 |
| > what the right way is... |
| 9 |
| > |
| 10 |
| |
| 11 |
| Yes they are. You obviously didn't read the questions. I'll paste: |
| 12 |
| OK, let's start with: what exactly is the problem? What is the correct |
| 13 |
| way to represent it? After that please explain how you came to see |
| 14 |
| sunrise as the wrong solution to that problem. |
| 15 |
| |
| 16 |
| Note, that nowhere did I aske what the right solution is. Please be |
| 17 |
| so kind as to actually *read* what others are saying to you, instead |
| 18 |
| of presuming. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Knowing what the problem is is part of making the solution. The problem |
| 21 |
is not that users can't push arbitrary content into a centralised |
| 22 |
official repository with no oversight from the herds appropriate for |
| 23 |
said content quickly enough. I didn't claim to know exactly what the |
| 24 |
real problem is, merely that it's not what's being solved here. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 28 |
Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives