| 1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> AFAICS, we would need 9 additional license files, namely GPL-{1,2,3}+, |
| 4 |
>> LGPL-{2,2.1,3}+, and FDL-{1.1,1.2,1.3}+. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Coming back to this, because the council has now rejected license |
| 7 |
> groups for EAPI 5. I would then create above-mentioned files in the |
| 8 |
> licenses dir. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Committed and added to appropriate license groups. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Concerning transition: This issue isn't the most pressing of our |
| 13 |
problems, so IMHO transition should be done gradually, whenever an |
| 14 |
ebuild is touched for another reason. We can evaluate things again in |
| 15 |
a year from now. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If you check the license of a package and find that e.g. GPL-2 |
| 18 |
(without the plus sign) is correct, then it would be useful to add a |
| 19 |
comment "GPL-2 only" to the ebuild. This is to avoid checking packages |
| 20 |
twice. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ulrich |
Archives