1 |
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 06:56:58PM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:40, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
3 |
> > 3) split the qt flag into a qt3 and a qt4 flag. This allows users to |
4 |
> > specifically pick qt3 or qt4 and the flag meanings are obvious - downsides |
5 |
> > are it is a lot of work. |
6 |
> I would like migration to this idea, that would have been what I've liked to |
7 |
> see for gtk too. |
8 |
|
9 |
Same here, both for gtk and for qt. Also, with qt it's slightly worse |
10 |
than with gtk: qt3 and qt4 are both huge, so if at all possible, I'd |
11 |
like to not see a requirement to install both qt3 and qt4 just to get |
12 |
poppler-bindings support for one (which would be required with a single |
13 |
flag). |
14 |
-- |
15 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |