Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please unmask app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-*-20081109
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:11:13
Message-Id: 20090721001113.5095f8be@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Please unmask app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-*-20081109 by Pacho Ramos
1 Hi,
2
3 Pacho Ramos <pacho@××××××××××××××××××××××××.es>:
4
5 > El dom, 05-07-2009 a las 14:14 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
6 > > I sent months ago:
7 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254577
8 > >
9 > > but I didn't get any reply yet. emul packages seem to be a bit
10 > > unmaintained, also, there are no updates since months, guide for
11 > > making emul packages is outdated
12 > > (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/emul/index.xml ) and I
13 > > have no idea about what amd64 plans to do on this area.
14 > >
15 > > But, at least, 20081109 emul packages fixes some important bugs
16 > > that are currently affecting to people using stable.
17 > >
18 > > Can anybody take a look on it?
19 > >
20 > > Thanks a lot
21 >
22 > Sorry for getting this up again but current stable emul packages have
23 > some problems (fixed in 20081109) and I haven't get any reply. I also
24 > tried to contact in the past with kingtaco and amd64 team without
25 > success (as the few people that replied from amd64 team weren't
26 > familiarized with emul packages)
27
28 I just did it (hi Fabian)...I don't use amd64, I am not part of the
29 architecture team so I am ready to take the beating. Anyway, Pacho
30 you can avoid such mails by becoming a developer finally.
31
32 V-Li
33
34 --
35 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
36 <URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
37
38 <URL:http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature